linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm64: Use update{,_tsk}_thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180523120239.GE26965@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 13:02:39 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm64: Use update{,_tsk}_thread_flag()

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:58:45AM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> This patch uses the new update_thread_flag() helpers to simplify a
> couple of if () set; else clear; constructs.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 19 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index 87a3536..0c4e7e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -618,10 +618,8 @@ int sve_set_vector_length(struct task_struct *task,
>  	task->thread.sve_vl = vl;
>  
>  out:
> -	if (flags & PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT)
> -		set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SVE_VL_INHERIT);
> -	else
> -		clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SVE_VL_INHERIT);
> +	update_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SVE_VL_INHERIT,
> +			       flags & PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -902,7 +900,7 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  	if (current->mm)
>  		task_fpsimd_save();
>  
> -	if (next->mm) {
> +	if (next->mm)
>  		/*
>  		 * If we are switching to a task whose most recent userland
>  		 * FPSIMD state is already in the registers of *this* cpu,
> @@ -910,13 +908,10 @@ void fpsimd_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>  		 * the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag so the state will be loaded
>  		 * upon the next return to userland.
>  		 */
> -		if (__this_cpu_read(fpsimd_last_state.st) ==
> -			&next->thread.uw.fpsimd_state
> -		    && next->thread.fpsimd_cpu == smp_processor_id())
> -			clear_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
> -		else
> -			set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
> -	}
> +		update_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE,
> +			__this_cpu_read(fpsimd_last_state.st) !=
> +				&next->thread.uw.fpsimd_state ||
> +			next->thread.fpsimd_cpu != smp_processor_id());

This will conflict with some patches in-flight from a chap called Dave
Martin ;)

Other than that:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Will