lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffa4e203-f320-b9be-c0d7-8432e949765b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 09:33:30 -0500
From:   "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To:     Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@...com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
        Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
        Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <jkkm@...com>,
        rajatxjain@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI/AER: Define and allocate aer_stats structure for
 AER capable devices

On 05/23/2018 09:32 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/23/2018 10:26 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:20:10AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_stats.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>
>>> Fix the formatting please - that gross // gibberish doesn't belong there.
>>
>> Sorry, Jes.  The Chief Penguin has Spoken, and that's the preferred
>> syntax:
>>
>> 2. Style:
>>
>>    The SPDX license identifier is added in form of a comment.  The comment
>>    style depends on the file type::
>>
>>       C source: // SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
>>
>> (you can dig up the discussion around this on the mailing list if you
>> like.  Linus actually thinks that C++ single-line comments are one of
>> the few things that language got right)
> 
> Well I'll agree to disagree with Linus on this one. It's ugly as fsck
> and allows for ambiguous statements in the code.

You misspelled "fuck".

Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ