[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c542388f-e417-f624-ade1-95f9a2fc8a3b@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:25:49 -0700
From: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Documentation: DT: Add optional 'timeout-sec'
property for sp805
On 5/23/2018 3:57 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 22/05/18 19:47, Ray Jui wrote:
>> Update the SP805 binding document to add optional 'timeout-sec'
>> devicetree property
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
>> index edc4f0e..f898a86 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sp805-wdt.txt
>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ Required properties:
>> Optional properties:
>> - interrupts : Should specify WDT interrupt number.
>> +- timeout-sec : Should specify default WDT timeout in seconds. If
>> unset, the
>> + default timeout is 30 seconds
>
> According to the SP805 TRM, the default interval is dependent on the
> rate of WDOGCLK, but would typically be a lot longer than that :/
>
> On a related note, anyone have any idea why we seem to have two subtly
> different SP805 bindings defined?
Interesting, I did not even know that until you pointed this out (and
it's funny that I found that I actually reviewed arm,sp805.txt
internally in Broadcom code review).
It looks like one was done by Bhupesh Sharma (sp805-wdt.txt) and the
other was done by Anup Patel (arm,sp805.txt). Both were merged at the
same time around March 20, 2016: 915c56bc01d6. I'd assume both were sent
out at around the same time.
It sounds like we should definitely remove one of them. Given that
sp805-wdt.txt appears to have more detailed descriptions on the use of
the clocks, should we remove arm,sp805.txt?
Thanks,
Ray
>
> Robin.
>
>> Examples:
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists