[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180523192022.1703-12-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 21:20:00 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/33] aio: try to complete poll iocbs without context switch
If we can acquire ctx_lock without spinning we can just remove our
iocb from the active_reqs list, and thus complete the iocbs from the
wakeup context.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/aio.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index bd711cfa4a1f..8274d09d44a2 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
void *key)
{
struct poll_iocb *req = container_of(wait, struct poll_iocb, wait);
+ struct aio_kiocb *iocb = container_of(req, struct aio_kiocb, poll);
struct file *file = req->file;
__poll_t mask = key_to_poll(key);
@@ -1648,9 +1649,22 @@ static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
__aio_poll_remove(req);
- req->events = mask;
- INIT_WORK(&req->work, aio_poll_work);
- schedule_work(&req->work);
+ /*
+ * Try completing without a context switch if we can acquire ctx_lock
+ * without spinning. Otherwise we need to defer to a workqueue to
+ * avoid a deadlock due to the lock order.
+ */
+ if (spin_trylock(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock)) {
+ list_del_init(&iocb->ki_list);
+ spin_unlock(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock);
+
+ __aio_poll_complete(req, mask);
+ } else {
+ req->events = mask;
+ INIT_WORK(&req->work, aio_poll_work);
+ schedule_work(&req->work);
+ }
+
return 1;
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists