[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <fdd36949-3a0c-0b7d-1946-34fd253569c5@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 14:19:29 +0200
From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 110/165] scsi: core: return BLK_STS_OK for DID_OK in
__scsi_error_from_host_byte()
Hopefully I haven't missed it in the stable queue, but do we need the
following on top (effectively not applying e39a97353e53)?:
commit cbe095e2b584623b882ebaf6c18e0b9077baa3f7
Author: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Date: Thu Apr 5 10:32:59 2018 -0700
Revert "scsi: core: return BLK_STS_OK for DID_OK in
__scsi_error_from_host_byte()"
The description of commit e39a97353e53 is wrong: it mentions that
commit
2a842acab109 introduced a bug in __scsi_error_from_host_byte()
although that
commit did not change the behavior of that function. Additionally,
commit
e39a97353e53 introduced a bug: it causes commands that fail with
hostbyte=DID_OK and driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE to be completed with
BLK_STS_OK. Hence revert that commit.
Fixes: e39a97353e53 ("scsi: core: return BLK_STS_OK for DID_OK in
__scsi_error_from_host_byte()")
Reported-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
On 05/24/2018 11:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>
> [ Upstream commit e39a97353e5378eb46bf01679799c5704d397f32 ]
>
> When converting __scsi_error_from_host_byte() to BLK_STS error codes the
> case DID_OK was forgotten, resulting in it always returning an error.
>
> Fixes: 2a842acab109 ("block: introduce new block status code type")
> Cc: Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ static blk_status_t __scsi_error_from_ho
> int result)
> {
> switch (host_byte(result)) {
> + case DID_OK:
> + return BLK_STS_OK;
> case DID_TRANSPORT_FAILFAST:
> return BLK_STS_TRANSPORT;
> case DID_TARGET_FAILURE:
>
>
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on IBM Z Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists