linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h: Rewrite using atomic_fetch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180524124410.GF12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 14:44:10 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h: Rewrite using
 atomic_fetch_*

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> +static inline void set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *p)
>  {
> +	p += BIT_WORD(nr);
> +	atomic_long_fetch_or_relaxed(BIT_MASK(nr), (atomic_long_t *)p);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void clear_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *p)
>  {
> +	p += BIT_WORD(nr);
> +	atomic_long_fetch_andnot_relaxed(BIT_MASK(nr), (atomic_long_t *)p);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void change_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *p)
>  {
> +	p += BIT_WORD(nr);
> +	atomic_long_fetch_xor_relaxed(BIT_MASK(nr), (atomic_long_t *)p);
>  }

Why use the fetch variants here?