[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0baf8584-7833-0917-4432-363b0ee31bbc@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:30:50 +0530
From: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
To: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
georgi.djakov@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
venkatg@...eaurora.org, jeremymc@...hat.com,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
riteshh@...eaurora.org, vbadigan@...eaurora.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>, sayalil@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] mmc: host: Register changes for sdcc V5
On 5/22/2018 11:42 PM, Evan Green wrote:
> Hi Vijay. Thanks for this patch.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:30 AM Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>
>
>> For SDCC version 5.0.0 and higher, new compatible string
>> "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5" is added.
>
>> Based on the msm variant, pick the relevant variant data and
>> use it for register read/write to msm specific registers.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 5 +-
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 344
> +++++++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> index bfdcdc4..c2b7b2b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> @@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ This file documents differences between the core
> properties in mmc.txt
>> and the properties used by the sdhci-msm driver.
>
>> Required properties:
>> -- compatible: Should contain "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4".
>> +- compatible: Should contain "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4" or "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5".
>> + For SDCC version 5.0.0, MCI registers are removed from
> SDCC
>> + interface and some registers are moved to HC. New
> compatible
>> + string is added to support this change -
> "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5".
>> - reg: Base address and length of the register in the following order:
>> - Host controller register map (required)
>> - SD Core register map (required)
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index bb2bb59..408e6b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -33,16 +33,11 @@
>> #define CORE_MCI_GENERICS 0x70
>> #define SWITCHABLE_SIGNALING_VOLTAGE BIT(29)
>
>> -#define CORE_HC_MODE 0x78
>
> Remove CORE_MCI_VERSION as well.
>
Missed it. Will remove
>> #define HC_MODE_EN 0x1
>> #define CORE_POWER 0x0
>> #define CORE_SW_RST BIT(7)
>> #define FF_CLK_SW_RST_DIS BIT(13)
>
>> -#define CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS 0xdc
>> -#define CORE_PWRCTL_MASK 0xe0
>> -#define CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR 0xe4
>> -#define CORE_PWRCTL_CTL 0xe8
>> #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF BIT(0)
>> #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON BIT(1)
>> #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW BIT(2)
>> @@ -63,17 +58,13 @@
>> #define CORE_CDR_EXT_EN BIT(19)
>> #define CORE_DLL_PDN BIT(29)
>> #define CORE_DLL_RST BIT(30)
>> -#define CORE_DLL_CONFIG 0x100
>> #define CORE_CMD_DAT_TRACK_SEL BIT(0)
>> -#define CORE_DLL_STATUS 0x108
>
>> -#define CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2 0x1b4
>> #define CORE_DDR_CAL_EN BIT(0)
>> #define CORE_FLL_CYCLE_CNT BIT(18)
>> #define CORE_DLL_CLOCK_DISABLE BIT(21)
>
>> -#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC 0x10c
>> -#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_POR_VAL 0xa1c
>> +#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_POR_VAL 0xa1c
>> #define CORE_CLK_PWRSAVE BIT(1)
>> #define CORE_HC_MCLK_SEL_DFLT (2 << 8)
>> #define CORE_HC_MCLK_SEL_HS400 (3 << 8)
>> @@ -111,17 +102,14 @@
>> #define CORE_CDC_SWITCH_BYPASS_OFF BIT(0)
>> #define CORE_CDC_SWITCH_RC_EN BIT(1)
>
>> -#define CORE_DDR_200_CFG 0x184
>> #define CORE_CDC_T4_DLY_SEL BIT(0)
>> #define CORE_CMDIN_RCLK_EN BIT(1)
>> #define CORE_START_CDC_TRAFFIC BIT(6)
>> -#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC3 0x1b0
>> +
>> #define CORE_PWRSAVE_DLL BIT(3)
>
>> -#define CORE_DDR_CONFIG 0x1b8
>> #define DDR_CONFIG_POR_VAL 0x80040853
>
>> -#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_CAPABILITIES0 0x11c
>
>> #define INVALID_TUNING_PHASE -1
>> #define SDHCI_MSM_MIN_CLOCK 400000
>> @@ -380,10 +368,14 @@ static inline int msm_dll_poll_ck_out_en(struct
> sdhci_host *host, u8 poll)
>> u32 wait_cnt = 50;
>> u8 ck_out_en;
>> struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
>> + msm_host->offset;
>
> I notice this pattern is pasted all over the place in order to get to the
> offsets. Maybe a macro or inlined function would be cleaner to get you to
> directly to the sdhci_msm_offset struct from sdhci_host, rather than this
> blob of paste soup everywhere. In some places you do seem to use the
> intermediate locals, so those cases wouldn't need to use the new helper.
>
>
>> /* Poll for CK_OUT_EN bit. max. poll time = 50us */
>> - ck_out_en = !!(readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG) &
>> - CORE_CK_OUT_EN);
>> + ck_out_en = !!(readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config) & CORE_CK_OUT_EN);
>
>> while (ck_out_en != poll) {
>> if (--wait_cnt == 0) {
>> @@ -393,8 +385,8 @@ static inline int msm_dll_poll_ck_out_en(struct
> sdhci_host *host, u8 poll)
>> }
>> udelay(1);
>
>> - ck_out_en = !!(readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> CORE_DLL_CONFIG) &
>> - CORE_CK_OUT_EN);
>> + ck_out_en = !!(readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config) & CORE_CK_OUT_EN);
>> }
>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -410,16 +402,20 @@ static int msm_config_cm_dll_phase(struct
> sdhci_host *host, u8 phase)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u32 config;
>> struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
>> + msm_host->offset;
>
>> if (phase > 0xf)
>> return -EINVAL;
>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~(CORE_CDR_EN | CORE_CK_OUT_EN);
>> config |= (CORE_CDR_EXT_EN | CORE_DLL_EN);
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> /* Wait until CK_OUT_EN bit of DLL_CONFIG register becomes '0' */
>> rc = msm_dll_poll_ck_out_en(host, 0);
>> @@ -430,24 +426,24 @@ static int msm_config_cm_dll_phase(struct
> sdhci_host *host, u8 phase)
>> * Write the selected DLL clock output phase (0 ... 15)
>> * to CDR_SELEXT bit field of DLL_CONFIG register.
>> */
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~CDR_SELEXT_MASK;
>> config |= grey_coded_phase_table[phase] << CDR_SELEXT_SHIFT;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_CK_OUT_EN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> /* Wait until CK_OUT_EN bit of DLL_CONFIG register becomes '1' */
>> rc = msm_dll_poll_ck_out_en(host, 1);
>> if (rc)
>> goto err_out;
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_CDR_EN;
>> config &= ~CORE_CDR_EXT_EN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
> Nit: host->ioaddr + msm_offset->core_dll_config might benefit from having
> its own local, since you use it so much in this function. Same goes for
> where I've noted below...
>
core_dll_config is very much used. But having a local for it feels like
a bad idea. As different versions come up, the most used register may
change. So it would be better to stick to a consistent approach to
accessing every register.
>> goto out;
>
>> err_out:
>> @@ -573,6 +569,10 @@ static int msm_find_most_appropriate_phase(struct
> sdhci_host *host,
>> static inline void msm_cm_dll_set_freq(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> {
>> u32 mclk_freq = 0, config;
>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
>> + msm_host->offset;
>
>> /* Program the MCLK value to MCLK_FREQ bit field */
>> if (host->clock <= 112000000)
>> @@ -592,10 +592,10 @@ static inline void msm_cm_dll_set_freq(struct
> sdhci_host *host)
>> else if (host->clock <= 200000000)
>> mclk_freq = 7;
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_MASK;
>> config |= mclk_freq << CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_SHIFT;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> }
>
>> /* Initialize the DLL (Programmable Delay Line) */
>> @@ -607,6 +607,8 @@ static int msm_init_cm_dll(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> int wait_cnt = 50;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u32 config;
>> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
>> + msm_host->offset;
>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>
>> @@ -615,34 +617,43 @@ static int msm_init_cm_dll(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> * tuning is in progress. Keeping PWRSAVE ON may
>> * turn off the clock.
>> */
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_vendor_spec);
>> config &= ~CORE_CLK_PWRSAVE;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
> msm_offset->core_vendor_spec);
>
>> if (msm_host->use_14lpp_dll_reset) {
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~CORE_CK_OUT_EN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> config |= CORE_DLL_CLOCK_DISABLE;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> }
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_DLL_RST;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_DLL_PDN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> msm_cm_dll_set_freq(host);
>
>> if (msm_host->use_14lpp_dll_reset &&
>> !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(msm_host->xo_clk)) {
>> u32 mclk_freq = 0;
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> config &= CORE_FLL_CYCLE_CNT;
>> if (config)
>> mclk_freq = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((host->clock *
> 8),
>> @@ -651,40 +662,52 @@ static int msm_init_cm_dll(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> mclk_freq = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((host->clock *
> 4),
>> clk_get_rate(msm_host->xo_clk));
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> config &= ~(0xFF << 10);
>> config |= mclk_freq << 10;
>
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> /* wait for 5us before enabling DLL clock */
>> udelay(5);
>> }
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~CORE_DLL_RST;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config &= ~CORE_DLL_PDN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> if (msm_host->use_14lpp_dll_reset) {
>> msm_cm_dll_set_freq(host);
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> config &= ~CORE_DLL_CLOCK_DISABLE;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG_2);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config_2);
>> }
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_DLL_EN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>> config |= CORE_CK_OUT_EN;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG);
>> + writel_relaxed(config, host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_dll_config);
>
>
> ...here. A local for host->ioaddr + msm_offset->core_dll_config would save
> you a lot of split lines.
>
>> @@ -1272,12 +1327,17 @@ static void sdhci_msm_dump_pwr_ctrl_regs(struct
> sdhci_host *host)
>> {
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
>> + msm_host->offset;
>
>> pr_err("%s: PWRCTL_STATUS: 0x%08x | PWRCTL_MASK: 0x%08x |
> PWRCTL_CTL: 0x%08x\n",
>> - mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
>> - readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem +
> CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS),
>> - readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem +
> CORE_PWRCTL_MASK),
>> - readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem +
> CORE_PWRCTL_CTL));
>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
>> + msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host,
>
> There's a weird extra space here.
>
>> + msm_offset->core_pwrctl_status),
>> + msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host,
>> + msm_offset->core_pwrctl_mask),
>> + msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host,
>> + msm_offset->core_pwrctl_ctl));
>
> I think the idea of function pointers is fine, but overall the use of them
> everywhere sure is ugly. It makes it really hard to actually see what's
> happening. I wonder if things might look a lot cleaner with a helper
> function here. Then instead of:
>
> msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host, msm_offset->core_pwrctl_ctl);
>
> You could have
>
> msm_core_read(host, msm_offset->core_pwrctl_ctl);
>
if we use a helper function, then we will have to pass msm_host into it
as well. Otherwise there would be the hassle of deriving msm_host
address from sdhci_host.
How about using a MACRO here instead for readability ?
>> @@ -1553,7 +1619,8 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct
> sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
>> */
>> u32 io_level = msm_host->curr_io_level;
>
>> - config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
>> + config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
>> + msm_offset->core_vendor_spec);
>
> Remove the second space before the readl_relaxed.
>
>> @@ -1710,32 +1793,40 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "TCXO clk not present (%d)\n", ret);
>> }
>
>> - core_memres = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
>> - msm_host->core_mem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev,
> core_memres);
>> + if (!msm_host->mci_removed) {
>> + core_memres = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> 1);
>> + msm_host->core_mem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev,
>> + core_memres);
>
>> - if (IS_ERR(msm_host->core_mem)) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remap registers\n");
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->core_mem);
>> - goto clk_disable;
>> + if (IS_ERR(msm_host->core_mem)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remap
> registers\n");
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->core_mem);
>> + goto clk_disable;
>> + }
>> }
>
>> /* Reset the vendor spec register to power on reset state */
>> writel_relaxed(CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_POR_VAL,
>> - host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
>> -
>> - /* Set HC_MODE_EN bit in HC_MODE register */
>> - writel_relaxed(HC_MODE_EN, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_HC_MODE));
>> -
>> - config = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_HC_MODE);
>> - config |= FF_CLK_SW_RST_DIS;
>> - writel_relaxed(config, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_HC_MODE);
>> + host->ioaddr + msm_offset->core_vendor_spec);
>> +
>> + if (!msm_host->mci_removed) {
>> + /* Set HC_MODE_EN bit in HC_MODE register */
>> + msm_host->var_ops->msm_writel_relaxed(HC_MODE_EN, host,
>> + msm_offset->core_hc_mode);
>> + config = msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host,
>> + msm_offset->core_hc_mode);
>> + config |= FF_CLK_SW_RST_DIS;
>> + msm_host->var_ops->msm_writel_relaxed(config, host,
>> + msm_offset->core_hc_mode);
>> + }
>
>> host_version = readw_relaxed((host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_VERSION));
>> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Host Version: 0x%x Vendor Version 0x%x\n",
>> host_version, ((host_version & SDHCI_VENDOR_VER_MASK) >>
>> SDHCI_VENDOR_VER_SHIFT));
>
>> - core_version = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem +
> CORE_MCI_VERSION);
>> + core_version = msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host,
>> + msm_offset->core_mci_version);
>
> Another double space after the =. Perhaps this was a find/replace error?
> Look out for more of these that I missed.
>
> -Evan
>
Thanks for pointing these out. Will check for such issues in all 3 patches.
Thanks,
Vijay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists