linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] vfio: ccw: error handling fixes and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180524162940.13d3b2df.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 16:29:40 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        pmorel@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] vfio: ccw: error handling fixes and improvements

On Wed, 23 May 2018 12:21:29 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 May 2018 04:56:41 +0200
> Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Reviewers,
> > 
> > Here is a new version for this patch series.
> > 
> > We didn't get agreement on patch #4 (#5 in v2) in the former cycle though,
> > I made it based on my understanding. We can continue discussing on it.  
> 
> I'll probably go ahead and queue 1-3 (would not mind r-bs, though) in
> any case.
> 
> I hope we can queue the tracing patch as well, as any tracing beats no
> tracing :)

OK, I've pushed this out to the vfio-ccw branch.

Would still be great to get some R-bs.

What about sending a pull req next week, so that we get this ready for
the 4.18 merge window?