[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524143629.2ofsg7mhjixr5pnm@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:36:30 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] signal: Revert ptrace preempt magic
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Upstream commit '53da1d9456fe7f8 fix ptrace slowness' is nothing more
than a bandaid around the ptrace design trainwreck. It's not a
correctness issue, it's merily a cosmetic bandaid.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/signal.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1876,15 +1876,7 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, i
if (gstop_done && ptrace_reparented(current))
do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why);
- /*
- * Don't want to allow preemption here, because
- * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive.
- *
- * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched().
- */
- preempt_disable();
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
freezable_schedule();
} else {
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists