[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <137eab54-86df-cc7d-4618-bce49dfbc2d2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:37:05 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]: perf/x86: store user space frame-pointer value on a
sample
Hi,
On 23.05.2018 16:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 01:06:58PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
>> Is the patch ready to be up streamed now?
>
> Please post a new one where you modify the comment about the syscalls
> not saving registers and ideally find the commit that made it so.
Sent v3 with adjusted comment.
As far comments become outdated quickly tried to be terse.
>
> Also; I think Andy would appreciate a comment near the syscall code that
> refers back to this code and states what registers we rely upon being
> there (+BP for this patch).
Not sure if I can find all proper places to put comments there.
However there is PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS macro that is employed at system
call implementation so it is possible to put something like this there:
.macro PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS rdx=%rdx rax=%rax save_ret=0
/*
...
* perf/core subsystem relies on bp register value stored
* at pt_regs->bp; see arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c: perf_get_regs_user()
* for more details;
...
*/
Thanks,
Alexey
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists