[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524175940.GC4828@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:59:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mutanen, Mikko" <Mikko.Mutanen@...rohmeurope.com>,
"Haikola, Heikki" <Heikki.Haikola@...rohmeurope.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] regulator: bd71837: BD71837 PMIC regulator driver
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:51:27PM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > what is the lock doing and what is this wrapper function intended to do?
> This was the other spot which I was unsure how to handle. Datasheet for
> the chip says that if voltage is to be changed, the regulator must be
> disabled. Thus my voltage changing function checks if regulator is enabled
Ugh, this chip is not very good is it? Don't bounce the supply to
change the voltage silently, that's clearly a bad idea - the devices
using the supply are going to get very upset when the power gets removed
just because they changed the voltage. Instead implement a custom set
operation that returns an error if the user attempts to change the
voltage while the regualtor is enabled.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists