linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/165] 4.14.44-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180524181921.GC13327@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:19:21 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/165] 4.14.44-stable review

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:12:09PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.44 release.
> > There are 165 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat May 26 09:35:46 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.14.44-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.14.y
> git commit: 04c57158a60d4a6b72a8d04b39390eb2dbad0e73
> git describe: v4.14.43-165-g04c57158a60d
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.43-165-g04c57158a60d
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.14.43-166-ga3881b7a4d3c)
> 

Same question as before. Why not against v4.14.43 ?

Thanks,
Guenter

> 
> Ran 11106 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> 
> Environments
> --------------
> - dragonboard-410c - arm64
> - hi6220-hikey - arm64
> - juno-r2 - arm64
> - qemu_arm
> - qemu_arm64
> - qemu_x86_64
> - x15 - arm
> - x86_64
> 
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * boot
> * kselftest
> * libhugetlbfs
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-timers-tests
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
> 
> -- 
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org