linux-kernel - Re: write_lock_irq(&tasklist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180524182806.GL12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 20:28:06 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, sherryy@...roid.com,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock)

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:37:25AM -0700, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
>  Kernel version is locked for couple of products and same issue observed on
> both 4.14.41
> and 4.9.96 kernels. We can only accept the stable updates from upstream for
> these products.

> If QUEUED_RWLOCKS works on above listed kernel versions without any issues,
> we can enabled QUEUED_RWLOCKS.

You want:

e0d02285f16e ("locking/qrwlock: Use 'struct qrwlock' instead of 'struct __qrwlock'")
4df714be4dcf ("locking/atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_acquire()")
b519b56e378e ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock")
087133ac9076 ("locking/qrwlock, arm64: Move rwlock implementation over to qrwlocks")
d13316614633 ("locking/qrwlock: Prevent slowpath writers getting held up by fastpath")

IIRC, enabling QUEUED_RWLOCKS will 'work' but esp. that
atomic_cond_read_acquire() one is goodness for ARM64.

> Can we go ahead with Linus suggestion for these kernel version?
> So that IRQ wont be disabled for quite a long time.
> 
>  static void tasklist_write_lock(void)
>    {
>          unsigned long flags;
>          local_irq_save(flags);
>          while (!write_trylock(&tasklist_lock)) {
>                  local_irq_restore(flags);
>                  do { cpu_relax(); } while (write_islocked(&tasklist_lock));
>                  local_irq_disable();
>          }
>    }

First you say you can only take stable updates, then you ask for a
gruesome hack that will seriously regress architectures that do use
qrwlock which will hence never make it into stable.

Just take the arm64 qrwlock patches and pretend they're from stable.