[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3848a4ad-2c0e-691f-e98f-347cfe3484e8@c-s.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 08:20:16 +0200
From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly
Le 23/05/2018 à 20:34, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> The generic csum_ipv6_magic() generates a pretty bad result
>
> <snip>
>
> Please try with a more recent compiler, what you used is pretty ancient.
> It's not like recent compilers do great on this either, but it's not
> *that* bad anymore ;-)
>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> @@ -293,3 +293,36 @@ dst_error:
>> EX_TABLE(51b, dst_error);
>>
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_generic)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * static inline __sum16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
>> + * const struct in6_addr *daddr,
>> + * __u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum sum)
>> + */
>> +
>> +_GLOBAL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>> + lwz r8, 0(r3)
>> + lwz r9, 4(r3)
>> + lwz r10, 8(r3)
>> + lwz r11, 12(r3)
>> + addc r0, r5, r6
>> + adde r0, r0, r7
>> + adde r0, r0, r8
>> + adde r0, r0, r9
>> + adde r0, r0, r10
>> + adde r0, r0, r11
>> + lwz r8, 0(r4)
>> + lwz r9, 4(r4)
>> + lwz r10, 8(r4)
>> + lwz r11, 12(r4)
>> + adde r0, r0, r8
>> + adde r0, r0, r9
>> + adde r0, r0, r10
>> + adde r0, r0, r11
>> + addze r0, r0
>> + rotlwi r3, r0, 16
>> + add r3, r0, r3
>> + not r3, r3
>> + rlwinm r3, r3, 16, 16, 31
>> + blr
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>
> Clustering the loads and carry insns together is pretty much the worst you
> can do on most 32-bit CPUs.
Oh, really ? __csum_partial is written that way too.
Right, now I tried interleaving the lwz and adde. I get no improvment at
all on a 885, but I get a 15% improvment on a 8321.
Christophe
>
>
> Segher
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists