[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <501407b0-ae9b-7943-0789-fb1c9959f7fe@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 13:40:04 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, "Ed L. Cashin" <ed.cashin@....org>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
nbd@...er.debian.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
On 5/24/18 7:01 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 06:47 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/23/18 4:35 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 15:27 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 5/23/18 2:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>> Convert the S_<FOO> symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents as
>>>>> using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more
>>>>> readable.
>>>>>
>>>>> see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945
>>>>>
>>>>> Done with automated conversion via:
>>>>> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS --fix-inplace <files...>
>>>>>
>>>>> Miscellanea:
>>>>>
>>>>> o Wrapped modified multi-line calls to a single line where appropriate
>>>>> o Realign modified multi-line calls to open parenthesis
>>>>
>>>> Honestly, I see this as pretty needless churn.
>>>
>>> btw:
>>>
>>> There is currently a mixture of symbolic and octal
>>> permissions uses in block and drivers/block
>>>
>>> ie: 94 octal and 146 symbolic uses.
>>>
>>> If this is applied, all would become octal.
>>
>> That does help justify the change. My main worry here is creating
>> unnecessary conflicts, which is always annoying. But it's even more
>> annoying when the change creating the conflict isn't really that
>> important at all. Case in point, the patch doesn't apply to the
>> for-4.18/block branch that it should go into...
>
> Done against most recent -next as it's basically impossible
> to do anything against multiple private trees.
>
> Also, the script that generated the patch is in the changelog
> so it's simple to rerun.
Alright, applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists