[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1527144234-96396-1-git-send-email-kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 14:43:54 +0800
From: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@...ilicon.com>
To: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gengyanping@...ilicon.com>, <sunzhaosheng@...ilicon.com>,
Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: reinitialize new policy min/max when writing scaling_(max|min)_freq
consider such situation, current user_policy.min is 1000000,
current user_policy.max is 1200000, in cpufreq_set_policy,
other driver may update policy.min to 1200000, policy.max to
1300000. After that, If we input "echo 1300000 > scaling_min_freq",
then user_policy.min will be 1300000, and user_policy.max is
still 1200000, because the input value is checked with policy.max
not user_policy.max. if we get all related cpus offline and
online again, it will cause cpufreq_init_policy fail because
user_policy.min is higher than user_policy.max.
The solution is when user space tries to write scaling_(max|min)_freq,
the min/max of new_policy should be reinitialized with min/max
of user_policy, like what cpufreq_update_policy does.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@...ilicon.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b79c532..8b33e08 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -697,6 +697,8 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name \
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; \
\
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); \
+ new_policy->min = policy->user_policy.min; \
+ new_policy->max = policy->user_policy.max; \
\
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &new_policy.object); \
if (ret != 1) \
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists