linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 0/6] rhashtable: guarantee first allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxnrwFniJq6nCFn4pWRHLH-Wac9bVFKieBC-TixTsFg=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 14:41:42 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
        guillaume.knispel@...ersonicimagine.com,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/6] rhashtable: guarantee first allocation

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:28 PM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
>   10 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

I certainly can't complain about this small code removal, but I think if we
did the kvmalloc_node() cleanup, we'd be able to get rid of even more.

For example, bucket_table_alloc() does that

         if (gfp != GFP_KERNEL)
                 tbl = kzalloc(size, gfp | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);
         else
                 tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp);

purely due to the kvalloc_node() oddity. Wouldn't it be nice to just write
it as

         tbl = kvzalloc(size, gfp);

knowing that the whole point of all the kv*alloc*() functions is to "just
do the right thing given size, gpf mask, and ease of allocation".

             Linus