[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYCdNZ=ASw1uz4zKXC4AMd1EGbvG_G5K5cwSpH5eGPgKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 10:28:44 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Levin Du <djw@...hip.com.cn>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Wayne Chou <zxf@...hip.com.cn>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpio: syscon: Add gpio-syscon for rockchip
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> So the gpio controller should definitly also be a subnode.
>
> The gpio in question is called "mute", so I'd think the gpio-syscon driver
> should just define a "rockchip,rk3328-gpio-mute" compatible and contain
> all the register voodoo in the driver itself and not define it in the dt.
>
> So it should probably look like
>
> grf: syscon at ff100000 {
> compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>
> [all the other syscon sub-devices]
>
> gpio_mute: gpio-mute {
> compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-gpio-mute";
> gpio-controller;
> #gpio-cells = <2>;
> };
I'm sceptic.
That doesn't sound like "general purpose input output" at all.
It sounds like special purpose, for a mute button.
Does it use IRQ? I would recommend implementing
drivers/input/keyboard/syscon-keys.c in the same vein
as drivers/leds/leds-syscon.c so you can avoid indirection
through GPIO for no good reason at all.
I already have other good uses for such a generic
input driver.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists