[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbr-fRKKwPfuL1gqM_zRWjq=TRT+kgGttzUPUKgQ7B0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 10:30:48 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: at91-pio4: add missing of_node_put
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
> jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
>
> for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> + of_node_put(child);
> ? break;
> ...
> }
> ... when != child
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Patch applied with Ludovic's ACK!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists