[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <675528c5-89d6-a4f5-e91a-6d75fdbef9af@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:09:16 +0800
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@...ium.com>,
Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...ium.com>,
"jthumshirn@...e.de" <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: scsi/qla2xxx: BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req) is triggered in
blk_finish_request
Hi Himanshu
Thanks god get response from your side finally :)
I get qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com from the maintainer information of driver/scsi/qla2xxx
Looks like it should be modified.
Thanks
Jianchao
On 05/24/2018 12:21 PM, Madhani, Himanshu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes. We'll look at this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Himanshu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jianchao.wang [mailto:jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 6:51 PM
>> To: Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...ium.com>; Madhani,
>> Himanshu <Himanshu.Madhani@...ium.com>; jthumshirn@...e.de
>> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>;
>> Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
>> Subject: Re: BUG: scsi/qla2xxx: BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req) is triggered in
>> blk_finish_request
>>
>> Would anyone please take a look at this ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Jianchao
>>
>> On 05/23/2018 11:55 AM, jianchao.wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Our customer met a panic triggered by BUG_ON in blk_finish_request.
>>> >From the dmesg log, the BUG_ON was triggered after command abort
>> occurred many times.
>>> There is a race condition in the following scenario.
>>>
>>> cpu A cpu B
>>> kworker interrupt
>>>
>>> scmd_eh_abort_handler()
>>> -> scsi_try_to_abort_cmd()
>>> -> qla2xxx_eh_abort()
>>> -> qla2x00_eh_wait_on_command() qla2x00_status_entry()
>>> -> qla2x00_sp_compl()
>>> -> qla2x00_sp_free_dma()
>>> -> scsi_queue_insert()
>>> -> __scsi_queue_insert()
>>> -> blk_requeue_request()
>>> -> blk_clear_rq_complete()
>>> -> scsi_done
>>> -> blk_complete_request
>>> -> blk_mark_rq_complete
>>> -> elv_requeue_request() -> __blk_complete_request()
>>> -> __elv_add_request()
>>> // req will be queued here
>>> BLK_SOFTIRQ
>>> scsi_softirq_done()
>>> -> scsi_finish_command()
>>> -> scsi_io_completion()
>>> -> scsi_end_request()
>>> -> blk_finish_request() //
>> BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req)) !!!
>>>
>>> The issue will not be triggered most of time, because the request is marked as
>> complete by timeout path.
>>> So the scsi_done from qla2x00_sp_compl does nothing.
>>> But as the scenario above, if the complete state has been cleaned by
>> blk_requeue_request, we will get
>>> the request both requeued and completed, and then
>> BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req)) in blk_finish_request comes up.
>>>
>>> Is there any solution for this in qla2xxx driver side ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jianchao
>>>
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists