linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] mfd: cros-ec: Introduce CEC commands and events definitions.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb0b5060-5ccc-814c-5256-53151a831178@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:11:16 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        hans.verkuil@...co.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, olof@...om.net,
        seanpaul@...gle.com
Cc:     sadolfsson@...gle.com, felixe@...gle.com, bleung@...gle.com,
        darekm@...gle.com, marcheu@...omium.org, fparent@...libre.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        eballetbo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] mfd: cros-ec: Introduce CEC commands and events
 definitions.

On 24/05/18 10:54, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> The EC can expose a CEC bus, this patch adds the CEC related definitions
> needed by the cros-ec-cec driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> index cc0768e..ea9646f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> @@ -804,6 +804,8 @@ enum ec_feature_code {
>  	EC_FEATURE_MOTION_SENSE_FIFO = 24,
>  	/* EC has RTC feature that can be controlled by host commands */
>  	EC_FEATURE_RTC = 27,
> +	/* EC supports CEC commands */
> +	EC_FEATURE_CEC = 35,
>  };
>  
>  #define EC_FEATURE_MASK_0(event_code) (1UL << (event_code % 32))
> @@ -2078,6 +2080,12 @@ enum ec_mkbp_event {
>  	/* EC sent a sysrq command */
>  	EC_MKBP_EVENT_SYSRQ = 6,
>  
> +	/* Notify the AP that something happened on CEC */
> +	EC_MKBP_CEC_EVENT = 8,
> +
> +	/* Send an incoming CEC message to the AP */
> +	EC_MKBP_EVENT_CEC_MESSAGE = 9,
> +
>  	/* Number of MKBP events */
>  	EC_MKBP_EVENT_COUNT,
>  };
> @@ -2850,6 +2858,83 @@ struct ec_params_reboot_ec {
>  
>  /*****************************************************************************/
>  /*
> + * HDMI CEC commands
> + *
> + * These commands are for sending and receiving message via HDMI CEC
> + */
> +#define MAX_CEC_MSG_LEN 16

Can you rename this to EC_MAX_CEC_MSG_LEN? It is way too similar to the
CEC_MAX_MSG_LEN defined in cec.h. Since this is a property of the EC hw/fw
it makes sense to prefix it accordingly.

> +
> +/* CEC message from the AP to be written on the CEC bus */
> +#define EC_CMD_CEC_WRITE_MSG 0x00B8
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ec_params_cec_write - Message to write to the CEC bus
> + * @msg: message content to write to the CEC bus
> + */
> +struct ec_params_cec_write {
> +	uint8_t msg[MAX_CEC_MSG_LEN];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* Set various CEC parameters */
> +#define EC_CMD_CEC_SET 0x00BA
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ec_params_cec_set - CEC parameters set
> + * @cmd: parameter type, can be CEC_CMD_ENABLE or CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS
> + * @enable: in case cmd is CEC_CMD_ENABLE, this field can be 0 to disable CEC
> + * 	or 1 to enable CEC functionnality
> + * @address: in case cmd is CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS, this field encodes the
> + *	requested logical address between 0 and 15 or 0xff to unregister
> + */
> +struct ec_params_cec_set {
> +	uint8_t cmd; /* enum cec_command */
> +	union {
> +		uint8_t enable;
> +		uint8_t address;
> +	};
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* Read various CEC parameters */
> +#define EC_CMD_CEC_GET 0x00BB
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ec_params_cec_get - CEC parameters get
> + * @cmd: parameter type, can be CEC_CMD_ENABLE or CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS
> + */
> +struct ec_params_cec_get {
> +	uint8_t cmd; /* enum cec_command */
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ec_response_cec_get - CEC parameters get response
> + * @enable: in case cmd was CEC_CMD_ENABLE, this field will 0 if CEC is
> + * 	disabled or 1 if CEC functionnality is enabled
> + * @address: in case cmd was CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS, this will encode the
> + *	configured logical address between 0 and 15 or 0xff if unregistered
> + */
> +struct ec_response_cec_get {
> +	union {
> +		uint8_t enable;
> +		uint8_t address;
> +	};
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* CEC parameters command */
> +enum cec_command {

Same here: shouldn't all of this be prefixed with ec_ or EC_?

Regards,

	Hans

> +	/* CEC reading, writing and events enable */
> +	CEC_CMD_ENABLE,
> +	/* CEC logical address  */
> +	CEC_CMD_LOGICAL_ADDRESS,
> +};
> +
> +/* Events from CEC to AP */
> +enum mkbp_cec_event {
> +	EC_MKBP_CEC_SEND_OK			= BIT(0),
> +	EC_MKBP_CEC_SEND_FAILED			= BIT(1),
> +};
> +
> +/*****************************************************************************/
> +/*
>   * Special commands
>   *
>   * These do not follow the normal rules for commands.  See each command for
>