lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180524093609.860368100@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:39:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 78/96] clk: samsung: exynos5433: Fix PLL rates

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>

[ Upstream commit ab0447845cffc0fd752df2ccd6b4e34006000ce4 ]

Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of the PLL's child clock
might be set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
That is, the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
greater than 196608000.

To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
by the PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static const struct samsung_pll_rate_tab
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(800000000U,  400, 6,  1),
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(733000000U,  733, 12, 1),
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(700000000U,  175, 3,  1),
-	PLL_35XX_RATE(667000000U,  222, 4,  1),
+	PLL_35XX_RATE(666000000U,  222, 4,  1),
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(633000000U,  211, 4,  1),
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(600000000U,  500, 5,  2),
 	PLL_35XX_RATE(552000000U,  460, 5,  2),
@@ -751,12 +751,12 @@ static const struct samsung_pll_rate_tab
 /* AUD_PLL */
 static const struct samsung_pll_rate_table exynos5443_aud_pll_rates[] __initconst = {
 	PLL_36XX_RATE(400000000U, 200, 3, 2,      0),
-	PLL_36XX_RATE(393216000U, 197, 3, 2, -25690),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(393216003U, 197, 3, 2, -25690),
 	PLL_36XX_RATE(384000000U, 128, 2, 2,      0),
-	PLL_36XX_RATE(368640000U, 246, 4, 2, -15729),
-	PLL_36XX_RATE(361507200U, 181, 3, 2, -16148),
-	PLL_36XX_RATE(338688000U, 113, 2, 2,  -6816),
-	PLL_36XX_RATE(294912000U,  98, 1, 3,  19923),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(368639991U, 246, 4, 2, -15729),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(361507202U, 181, 3, 2, -16148),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(338687988U, 113, 2, 2,  -6816),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(294912002U,  98, 1, 3,  19923),
 	PLL_36XX_RATE(288000000U,  96, 1, 3,      0),
 	PLL_36XX_RATE(252000000U,  84, 1, 3,      0),
 	{ /* sentinel */ }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ