[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b4c2c4f-00db-22b7-db3a-a1e76899c6d0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 18:36:08 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, mjw@...oraproject.org,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nickc@...hat.com, ccoutant@...il.com,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] x86/vdso: Add build salt to the vDSO
On 05/23/2018 05:06 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018, 17:01 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net <mailto:luto@...capital.net>> wrote:
>
>
> I don’t know whether I’m missing something obvious, but can’t this be in C?
>
>
> Yes, but I thought Laura wanted to limit it to linker file tricks (this thread has gone on for so long that I've forgotten the details of why).
>
> Linus
>
>
So we have to update the kernel and every module and the easiest way
to do that was the linker script. I was assuming I'd just use the
same approach for the vDSO but you're right that there's no reason
we can't apply a different technique. I notice there's already a
vdso-note.S which adds LINUX_VERSION_CODE as a note. This doesn't
include the extra version so it doesn't quite meet our needs.
There's no reason why we can't throw something else in there for
good measure.
Thanks,
Laura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists