linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 101/161] crypto: inside-secure - do not process request if no command was issued

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:38:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 101/161] crypto: inside-secure - do not process request if no command was issued

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>

[ Upstream commit 95831ceafc0de7d94a5fe86ebb1c2042317cc2cd ]

This patch adds a check in the SafeXcel dequeue function, to avoid
processing request further if no hardware command was issued. This can
happen in certain cases where the ->send() function caches all the data
that would have been send.

Fixes: 809778e02cd4 ("crypto: inside-secure - fix hash when length is a multiple of a block")
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
@@ -490,6 +490,15 @@ handle_req:
 		if (backlog)
 			backlog->complete(backlog, -EINPROGRESS);
 
+		/* In case the send() helper did not issue any command to push
+		 * to the engine because the input data was cached, continue to
+		 * dequeue other requests as this is valid and not an error.
+		 */
+		if (!commands && !results) {
+			kfree(request);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock);
 		list_add_tail(&request->list, &priv->ring[ring].list);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock);