[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524102837.GA3948@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:28:37 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize
isolated_cpus
On 17/05/18 16:55, Waiman Long wrote:
[...]
> @@ -849,7 +860,12 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
> * passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains().
> * Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains.
> */
> - if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> + if (!top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
> + !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
> + !cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> goto out;
Do we cover the case in which hotplug removed one of the isolated cpus
from cpu_active_mask?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists