lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 12:28:37 +0200
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize
 isolated_cpus

On 17/05/18 16:55, Waiman Long wrote:

[...]

> @@ -849,7 +860,12 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
>  	 * passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains().
>  	 * Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains.
>  	 */
> -	if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> +	if (!top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
> +	    !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
> +	   !cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
>  		goto out;

Do we cover the case in which hotplug removed one of the isolated cpus
from cpu_active_mask?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ