[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524110058.mrkwc3rx5l3v6wad@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:00:58 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] arm64: Call ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 on transitions
between EL0 and EL1
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:06:36PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order for the kernel to protect itself, let's call the SSBD mitigation
> implemented by the higher exception level (either hypervisor or firmware)
> on each transition between userspace and kernel.
>
> We must take the PSCI conduit into account in order to target the
> right exception level, hence the introduction of a runtime patching
> callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index a900befadfe8..46b3aafb631a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,24 @@ enable_smccc_arch_workaround_1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD
> +void __init arm64_update_smccc_conduit(struct alt_instr *alt,
> + __le32 *origptr, __le32 *updptr,
> + int nr_inst)
> +{
> + u32 insn;
> +
> + BUG_ON(nr_inst != 1);
> +
> + if (psci_ops.conduit == PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC)
> + insn = aarch64_insn_get_hvc_value();
> + else
> + insn = aarch64_insn_get_smc_value();
Shouldn't this also handle the case where there is no conduit?
See below comment in apply_ssbd for rationale.
> +
> + *updptr = cpu_to_le32(insn);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD */
> +
> #define CAP_MIDR_RANGE(model, v_min, r_min, v_max, r_max) \
> .matches = is_affected_midr_range, \
> .midr_range = MIDR_RANGE(model, v_min, r_min, v_max, r_max)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index ec2ee720e33e..f33e6aed3037 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/linkage.h>
>
> @@ -137,6 +138,18 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
> add \dst, \dst, #(\sym - .entry.tramp.text)
> .endm
>
> + // This macro corrupts x0-x3. It is the caller's duty
> + // to save/restore them if required.
> + .macro apply_ssbd, state
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD
> + mov w0, #ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2
> + mov w1, #\state
> +alternative_cb arm64_update_smccc_conduit
> + nop // Patched to SMC/HVC #0
> +alternative_cb_end
> +#endif
> + .endm
If my system doesn't have SMCCC1.1, or the FW doesn't have an
implementation of ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, does this stay as a NOP?
It looks like this would be patched to an SMC, which would be fatal on
systems without EL3 FW.
> +
> .macro kernel_entry, el, regsize = 64
> .if \regsize == 32
> mov w0, w0 // zero upper 32 bits of x0
> @@ -163,6 +176,13 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
> ldr x19, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // since we can unmask debug
> disable_step_tsk x19, x20 // exceptions when scheduling.
>
> + apply_ssbd 1
... and thus kernel_entry would be fatal.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists