linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 71/96] clk: Dont show the incorrect clock phase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180524093609.470469718@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:38:54 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 71/96] clk: Dont show the incorrect clock phase

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>

[ Upstream commit 1f9c63e8de3d7b377c9d74e4a17524cfb60e6384 ]

It's found that the clock phase output from clk_summary is
wrong compared to the actual phase reading from the register.

cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary | grep sdio_sample
sdio_sample     0        1        0 50000000          0 -22

It exposes an issue that clk core, clk_core_get_phase, always
returns the cached core->phase which should be either updated
by calling clk_set_phase or directly from the first place the
clk was registered.

When registering the clk, the core->phase geting from ->get_phase()
may return negative value indicating error. This is quite common
since the clk's phase may be highly related to its parent chain,
but it was temporarily orphan when registered, since its parent
chains hadn't be ready at that time, so the clk drivers decide to
return error in this case. However, if no clk_set_phase is called or
maybe the ->set_phase() isn't even implemented, the core->phase would
never be updated. This is wrong, and we should try to update it when
all its parent chains are settled down, like the way of updating clock
rate for that. But it's not deserved to complicate the code now and
just update it anyway when calling clk_core_get_phase, which would be
much simple and enough.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Acked-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1929,6 +1929,9 @@ static int clk_core_get_phase(struct clk
 	int ret;

 	clk_prepare_lock();
+	/* Always try to update cached phase if possible */
+	if (core->ops->get_phase)
+		core->phase = core->ops->get_phase(core->hw);
 	ret = core->phase;
 	clk_prepare_unlock();