lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 12:40:31 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] arm64: Add 'ssbd' command-line option

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 04:06:39PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On a system where the firmware implements ARCH_WORKAROUND_2,
> it may be useful to either permanently enable or disable the
> workaround for cases where the user decides that they'd rather
> not get a trap overhead, and keep the mitigation permanently
> on or off instead of switching it on exception entry/exit.
> 
> In any case, default to the mitigation being enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  17 ++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h             |   6 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c                  | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index f2040d46f095..646e112c6f63 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -4092,6 +4092,23 @@
>  			expediting.  Set to zero to disable automatic
>  			expediting.
>  
> +	ssbd=		[ARM64,HW]
> +			Speculative Store Bypass Disable control
> +
> +			On CPUs that are vulnerable to the Speculative
> +			Store Bypass vulnerability and offer a
> +			firmware based mitigation, this parameter
> +			indicates how the mitigation should be used:
> +
> +			force-on:  Unconditionnaly enable mitigation for
> +				   for both kernel and userspace
> +			force-off: Unconditionnaly disable mitigation for
> +				   for both kernel and userspace
> +			kernel:    Always enable mitigation in the
> +				   kernel, and offer a prctl interface
> +				   to allow userspace to register its
> +				   interest in being mitigated too.
> +
>  	stack_guard_gap=	[MM]
>  			override the default stack gap protection. The value
>  			is in page units and it defines how many pages prior
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 09b0f2a80c8f..9bc548e22784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -537,6 +537,12 @@ static inline u64 read_zcr_features(void)
>  	return zcr;
>  }
>  
> +#define ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN		-1
> +#define ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_DISABLE	0
> +#define ARM64_SSBD_EL1_ENTRY		1

The EL1_ENTRY part of the name is a bit misleading, since this doesn't
apply to EL1->EL1 exceptions (and as with many other bits of the arm64
code, it's arguably misleading in the VHE case).

Perhaps ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL, which would align with the parameter name?

Not a big deal either way, and otherwise this looks good to me.
Regardless:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Mark.

> +#define ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE		2
> +#define ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED		3
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index 7fd6d5b001f5..f1d4e75b0ddd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,38 @@ enable_smccc_arch_workaround_1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required);
>  
> +int ssbd_state __read_mostly = ARM64_SSBD_EL1_ENTRY;
> +
> +static const struct ssbd_options {
> +	const char	*str;
> +	int		state;
> +} ssbd_options[] = {
> +	{ "force-on",	ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE, },
> +	{ "force-off",	ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_DISABLE, },
> +	{ "kernel",	ARM64_SSBD_EL1_ENTRY, },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ssbd_cfg(char *buf)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!buf || !buf[0])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ssbd_options); i++) {
> +		int len = strlen(ssbd_options[i].str);
> +
> +		if (strncmp(buf, ssbd_options[i].str, len))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ssbd_state = ssbd_options[i].state;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +early_param("ssbd", ssbd_cfg);
> +
>  void __init arm64_update_smccc_conduit(struct alt_instr *alt,
>  				       __le32 *origptr, __le32 *updptr,
>  				       int nr_inst)
> @@ -272,44 +304,82 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
>  				    int scope)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> -	bool supported = true;
> +	bool required = true;
> +	s32 val;
>  
>  	WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
>  
> -	if (psci_ops.smccc_version == SMCCC_VERSION_1_0)
> +	if (psci_ops.smccc_version == SMCCC_VERSION_1_0) {
> +		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
>  		return false;
> +	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The probe function return value is either negative
> -	 * (unsupported or mitigated), positive (unaffected), or zero
> -	 * (requires mitigation). We only need to do anything in the
> -	 * last case.
> -	 */
>  	switch (psci_ops.conduit) {
>  	case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC:
>  		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
>  				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
> -		if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
> -			supported = false;
>  		break;
>  
>  	case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC:
>  		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
>  				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
> -		if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
> -			supported = false;
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> -		supported = false;
> +		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
> +		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (supported) {
> -		__this_cpu_write(arm64_ssbd_callback_required, 1);
> +	val = (s32)res.a0;
> +
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED:
> +		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
> +		return false;
> +
> +	case SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED:
> +		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED;
> +		return false;
> +
> +	case SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS:
> +		required = true;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case 1:	/* Mitigation not required on this CPU */
> +		required = false;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ON(1);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch (ssbd_state) {
> +	case ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_DISABLE:
> +		pr_info_once("%s disabled from command-line\n", entry->desc);
> +		do_ssbd(false);
> +		required = false;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case ARM64_SSBD_EL1_ENTRY:
> +		if (required) {
> +			__this_cpu_write(arm64_ssbd_callback_required, 1);
> +			do_ssbd(true);
> +		}
> +		break;
> +
> +	case ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE:
> +		pr_info_once("%s forced from command-line\n", entry->desc);
>  		do_ssbd(true);
> +		required = true;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ON(1);
> +		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	return supported;
> +	return required;
>  }
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD */
>  
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ