[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524043729.3bzk5dazstoq6xfb@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 10:07:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilialin@...eaurora.org>, vireshk@...nel.org, nm@...com,
sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver
On 23-05-18, 14:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 23/05/18 13:38, Ilia Lin wrote:
> > +static int __init qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Since the driver depends on smem and nvmem drivers, which may
> > + * return EPROBE_DEFER, all the real activity is done in the probe,
> > + * which may be defered as well. The init here is only registering
> > + * a platform device.
> > + */
> > + platform_device_register_simple("qcom-cpufreq-kryo", -1, NULL, 0);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +module_init(qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init);
>
> Do you need this at all ? See below on how to eliminate the need for this.
>
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver qcom_cpufreq_kryo_driver = {
> > + .probe = qcom_cpufreq_kryo_probe,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "qcom-cpufreq-kryo",
> > + },
> > +};
> > +builtin_platform_driver(qcom_cpufreq_kryo_driver);
>
> Use builtin_platform_driver_probe and remove qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init
> or use module_platform_driver_probe if it can be module.
I agree with this, just use a single init routine to register both the driver
and device.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists