lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 11:38:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, socketpair@...il.com,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...hiba.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 30/92] pipe: cap initial pipe capacity according to pipe-max-size limit

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@...il.com>

commit 086e774a57fba4695f14383c0818994c0b31da7c upstream.

This is a patch that provides behavior that is more consistent, and
probably less surprising to users. I consider the change optional, and
welcome opinions about whether it should be applied.

By default, pipes are created with a capacity of 64 kiB.  However,
/proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size may be set smaller than this value.  In this
scenario, an unprivileged user could thus create a pipe whose initial
capacity exceeds the limit. Therefore, it seems logical to cap the
initial pipe capacity according to the value of pipe-max-size.

The test program shown earlier in this patch series can be used to
demonstrate the effect of the change brought about with this patch:

    # cat /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
    1048576
    # sudo -u mtk ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1
    Initial pipe capacity: 65536
    # echo 10000 > /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
    # cat /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
    16384
    # sudo -u mtk ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1
    Initial pipe capacity: 16384
    # ./test_F_SETPIPE_SZ 1
    Initial pipe capacity: 65536

The last two executions of 'test_F_SETPIPE_SZ' show that pipe-max-size
caps the initial allocation for a new pipe for unprivileged users, but
not for privileged users.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/31dc7064-2a17-9c5b-1df1-4e3012ee992c@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: <socketpair@...il.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...hiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/pipe.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -616,6 +616,9 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(
 		unsigned long pipe_bufs = PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS;
 		struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
 
+		if (pipe_bufs * PAGE_SIZE > pipe_max_size && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+			pipe_bufs = pipe_max_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
 		if (!too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user)) {
 			if (too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user))
 				pipe_bufs = 1;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ