lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180525051031.36443-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 May 2018 22:10:31 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: let fstrim issue discard commands in lower priority

The fstrim gathers huge number of large discard commands, and tries to issue
without IO awareness, which results in long user-perceive IO latencies on
READ, WRITE, and FLUSH in UFS. We've observed some of commands take several
seconds due to long discard latency.

This patch limits the maximum size to 2MB per candidate, and check IO congestion
when issuing them to disk.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |   4 +-
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 3bddf13794d9..75ae7fc86ae8 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ enum {
 
 #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi)		BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)
 #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST		8	/* issue 8 discards per round */
+#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN		512	/* Max. 2MB per discard */
 #define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	50	/* 50 ms, if exists */
 #define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	500	/* 500 ms, if device busy */
 #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME	60000	/* 60 s, if no candidates */
@@ -698,7 +699,8 @@ static inline void set_extent_info(struct extent_info *ei, unsigned int fofs,
 static inline bool __is_discard_mergeable(struct discard_info *back,
 						struct discard_info *front)
 {
-	return back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart;
+	return (back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart) &&
+		(back->len + front->len < DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN);
 }
 
 static inline bool __is_discard_back_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 843fc2e6d41c..ba996d4091bc 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1139,68 +1139,6 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
-					unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
-{
-	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
-	struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
-	struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
-	struct discard_cmd *dc;
-	struct blk_plug plug;
-	int issued;
-
-next:
-	issued = 0;
-
-	mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
-	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
-
-	dc = (struct discard_cmd *)__lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
-					NULL, start,
-					(struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
-					(struct rb_entry **)&next_dc,
-					&insert_p, &insert_parent, true);
-	if (!dc)
-		dc = next_dc;
-
-	blk_start_plug(&plug);
-
-	while (dc && dc->lstart <= end) {
-		struct rb_node *node;
-
-		if (dc->len < dpolicy->granularity)
-			goto skip;
-
-		if (dc->state != D_PREP) {
-			list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->fstrim_list);
-			goto skip;
-		}
-
-		__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
-
-		if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
-			start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
-
-			blk_finish_plug(&plug);
-			mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
-
-			schedule();
-
-			goto next;
-		}
-skip:
-		node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
-		dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, rb_node);
-
-		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
-			break;
-	}
-
-	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
-	mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
-}
-
 static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 					struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
 {
@@ -2397,6 +2335,67 @@ bool exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
 	return has_candidate;
 }
 
+static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+					struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
+					unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
+{
+	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
+	struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
+	struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
+	struct discard_cmd *dc;
+	struct blk_plug plug;
+	int issued;
+
+next:
+	issued = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
+
+	dc = (struct discard_cmd *)__lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
+					NULL, start,
+					(struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
+					(struct rb_entry **)&next_dc,
+					&insert_p, &insert_parent, true);
+	if (!dc)
+		dc = next_dc;
+
+	blk_start_plug(&plug);
+
+	while (dc && dc->lstart <= end) {
+		struct rb_node *node;
+
+		if (dc->len < dpolicy->granularity)
+			goto skip;
+
+		if (dc->state != D_PREP) {
+			list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->fstrim_list);
+			goto skip;
+		}
+
+		__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
+
+		if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
+			start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
+
+			blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+			mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+			__wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy);
+			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
+			goto next;
+		}
+skip:
+		node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
+		dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, rb_node);
+
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
+			break;
+	}
+
+	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+	mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
+}
+
 int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
 {
 	__u64 start = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range->start);
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ