[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180525072636.GE11881@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:26:36 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [rfc patch] mm, oom: fix unnecessary killing of additional
processes
On Thu 24-05-18 14:22:53, David Rientjes wrote:
> The oom reaper ensures forward progress by setting MMF_OOM_SKIP itself if
> it cannot reap an mm. This can happen for a variety of reasons,
> including:
>
> - the inability to grab mm->mmap_sem in a sufficient amount of time,
>
> - when the mm has blockable mmu notifiers that could cause the oom reaper
> to stall indefinitely,
>
> but we can also add a third when the oom reaper can "reap" an mm but doing
> so is unlikely to free any amount of memory:
>
> - when the mm's memory is fully mlocked.
>
> When all memory is mlocked, the oom reaper will not be able to free any
> substantial amount of memory. It sets MMF_OOM_SKIP before the victim can
> unmap and free its memory in exit_mmap() and subsequent oom victims are
> chosen unnecessarily. This is trivial to reproduce if all eligible
> processes on the system have mlocked their memory: the oom killer calls
> panic() even though forward progress can be made.
>
> This is the same issue where the exit path sets MMF_OOM_SKIP before
> unmapping memory and additional processes can be chosen unnecessarily
> because the oom killer is racing with exit_mmap().
>
> We can't simply defer setting MMF_OOM_SKIP, however, because if there is
> a true oom livelock in progress, it never gets set and no additional
> killing is possible.
>
> To fix this, this patch introduces a per-mm reaping timeout, initially set
> at 10s. It requires that the oom reaper's list becomes a properly linked
> list so that other mm's may be reaped while waiting for an mm's timeout to
> expire.
No timeouts please! The proper way to handle this problem is to simply
teach the oom reaper to handle mlocked areas.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists