linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtof6XB1+zcNZBy+jhejHJQkVrG8jdLBusUG=a07F8ShQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 May 2018 13:28:43 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc:     Rafael Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review

Hi Daniel,

On 25 May 2018 at 07:04, Daniel Sangorrin
<daniel.sangorrin@...hiba.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
> The tests fcntl35 and fcntl35_64 should have go from FAIL to PASS.
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg239475.html

Thanks for the patch.

Now i have manually tested LTP syscalls and confirms,
fcntl35 and fcntl35_64 pass on qemu_x86_64, (arm64) Hikey, Juno and (arm32) x15.

Linux version 4.4.133-rc1 (buildslave@...-64-07) (gcc version 6.2.1 20161016
(Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11) ) #1 SMP Thu May 24 10:24:11 UTC 2018

[  131.873912] LTP: starting fcntl35
tst_test.c:980: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
fcntl35.c:101: PASS: an unprivileged user init the capacity of a pipe
to 4096 successfully
fcntl35.c:101: PASS: a privileged user init the capacity of a pipe to
65536 successfully
Summary:
passed   2
failed   0
skipped  0

[  132.090096] LTP: starting fcntl35_64
incrementing stop
tst_test.c:980: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
fcntl35.c:101: PASS: an unprivileged user init the capacity of a pipe
to 4096 successfully
fcntl35.c:101: PASS: a privileged user init the capacity of a pipe to
65536 successfully
Summary:
passed   2
failed   0
skipped  0
warnings 0

>
> Looking at
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9/testrun/228569/suite/ltp-syscalls-tests/tests/
> I see that these two tests (and other important tests as well) are being SKIPPED.

fcntl35 and fcntl35_64 will be unskipped from now on.

>
> By the way, I see that select04 FAILS in your case. But in my setup, select04 was working fine (x86_64) in 4.4.132. I will confirm that it still works in 4.4.133

select04 failed on (slow) qemu_arm only and PASS on real hardware of
arm32 x15, arm64 Juno and x86_64.
Test case verdict comparison across all boards and qemu,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/tests/ltp-syscalls-tests/select04

LTP select04 failed log on slow qemu_arm32,
tst_test.c:980: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
tst_timer_test.c:356: INFO: CLOCK_MONOTONIC resolution 1ns
tst_timer_test.c:368: INFO: prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) = 50us
tst_timer_test.c:275: INFO: select() sleeping for 1000us 500
iterations, threshold 450.01us
tst_timer_test.c:318: INFO: min 1336us, max 2282us, median 1522us,
trunc mean 1542.82us (discarded 25)
tst_timer_test.c:321: FAIL: select() slept for too long

Full log: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/228569#L8792

Best regards
Naresh Kamboju