[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180525090507.22248-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 11:05:05 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] rtmutex wait_lock is irq safe
Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the rtmutex
wait_lock is irq safe. Therefore the irqsave/restore in kernel/signal is no
longer required (see Patch 2/2). During discussions about v1 of this patch,
Eric Biederman noticed, that there is a no longer valid rcu_read_unlock()
documentation.
Therefore sending a short queue: fixing first the documentation of
rcu_read_unlock() and afterwards removing irqsave/restore in kernel/signal.
v1..v2:
- Add new patch updating rcu documentation as suggested by Eric Biederman
- Udpate commit message of kernel/signal patch
Thanks,
Anna-Maria
Anna-Maria Gleixner (2):
rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()
signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 +---
kernel/signal.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists