[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B07DFE3.2030804@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 18:05:23 +0800
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"zhong jiang" <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>,
"Liyong (Q)" <liyong1@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC] mm: why active file + inactive file is larger than cached +
buffers?
Hi, I find the active file + inactive file is larger than cached + buffers, about 5G,
and can not free it by "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
The meminfo shows that the mapped is also very small, so maybe some get the page? (e.g. get_user_pages())
Then it will dec the count of NR_FILE_PAGES when delete from page cache, but because of the count,
the page can not delete from lru, so left active file + inactive file so large, right?
MemTotal: 61528660 kB
MemFree: 48678936 kB
MemAvailable: 53657348 kB
Buffers: 10832 kB
Cached: 640340 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 5933664 kB
Inactive: 588968 kB
Active(anon): 1022200 kB
Inactive(anon): 533248 kB
Active(file): 4911464 kB
Inactive(file): 55720 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB
Dirty: 10952 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 980572 kB
Mapped: 85464 kB
Shmem: 581580 kB
Slab: 343480 kB
SReclaimable: 264632 kB
SUnreclaim: 78848 kB
KernelStack: 8368 kB
PageTables: 18012 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 28667176 kB
Committed_AS: 4144064 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 265848 kB
VmallocChunk: 34359417096 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
AnonHugePages: 688128 kB
HugePages_Total: 4
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 1048576 kB
DirectMap4k: 182112 kB
DirectMap2M: 11294720 kB
DirectMap1G: 51380224 kB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists