[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jfnwj-fVW+v99dNH=T2hU1JEYncVo7D+R=mq-noHF+pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:20:58 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PM / suspend / s2idle: avoiding splats on RT
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2018-05-25 12:05:31 [+0200], Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> > Patch #1 is a repost with the s2idle bits included. I tested via
>> > echo s2idle > mem_sleep && echo mem > state
>> >
>> > and I woke up the machine via the power on button. Patches #2+ were
>> > additionally required with s2idle.
>>
>> I quite don't like the first one for reasons explained in the reply to it.
>>
>> The others are fine by me and I can queue them up if you want me to do that.
>
> Yes, please. I will talk to tglx regarding #1 and get back to you.
OK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists