[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaTQOWA_5nyasxTwE=cGRis+uaLhw66pmkd+qPxMC6FFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 14:12:06 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, liuwei@...ions-semi.com,
96boards@...obotics.com,
OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
Mani Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@...il.com>,
"Thomas C. Liau" <thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com>,
Jeff Chen <jeff.chen@...ions-semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl entries
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
> FYI, I have ordered S700 based Cubieboard and will work on adding support for
> that first. I still don't have access to S500 board yet since it is not
> available on my region. Will find a way to get this asap.
Awesome, then we can count on some actions action here.
>> Also I had been investing efforts in explaining the upstreaming process
>> to Actions, last in November. I see Thomas Liau and Jeff Chen missing in
>> CC and I have not seen any Reviewed-by or Acked-by from anyone at
>> Actions on this and the preceding series. There are more chips than the
>> one on Linaro's 96board, so I would prefer to assure that the design
>> works for all. Thus I am very critical of you applying the patches
>> without waiting for review by Actions.
>
> I don't think Actions would be interested in any upstreaming efforts. It
> is our (comunity) responsibility to add support for that in order to
> have our boards running mainline kernel and that's what we both have been
> doing. Moreover I only saw once David Liau responded to your patchset and
> there isn't much further. So how can you expect the subsystem maintainer's
> to hold the patch series waiting for a so far silent SoC manufacturer's
> response?
They are certainly informed now! :D
Actions semi folks, please familiarize yourself with the following:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/actions,s900-pinctrl.txt?h=devel
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/tree/drivers/pinctrl/actions?h=devel
If you have any concerns with this, now is a good time to share them.
> I
> did ask you to add me as Co-Maintainer but you didn't responded to that.
> I know that I can't send any pull requests to Arnd, but we should sort
> it out IMO. Also, if you are completely swamped, then I take take up the
> maintainership role now inorder to keep the things moving. TBH I don't
> want my patches to be floating for months without any reason.
Doing some comainatinership can very well include doing pull
requests as long as you agree on who does what.
I think it may be a bit late for the next merge window right now,
but if you simply queue up stuff in some git tree and ask
Srothwell to include it in linux-next then Andreas can very well
pull it to his tree from there and then to ARM SoC or you can
queue patches as well.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists