[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ca9d240-f556-cb4f-1a58-4a55c379a02f@lechnology.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 13:21:12 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework
On 05/22/2018 04:38 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Friday 18 May 2018 10:18 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>> This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
>>
>> The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with the clock
>> drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.
>>
>> Then, starting with "ARM: davinci: pass clock as parameter to
>> davinci_timer_init()", we get the mach code ready for the switch by adding the
>> code needed for the new clock drivers and adding #ifndef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
>> around the legacy clocks so that we can switch easily between the old and the
>> new.
>>
>> "ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework" actually flips the switch
>> to start using the new clock drivers. Then the next 8 patches remove all
>> of the old clock code.
>>
>> The final four patches add device tree clock support to the one SoC that
>> supports it.
>>
>> This series has been tested on TI OMAP-L138 LCDK (both device tree and legacy
>> board file).
>
> If you do end up sending a v12, you can leave out the mach-davinci
> portions unless there are any changes you need to make. I will pick them
> up from this series once the driver dependencies are merged.
>
> I do hope the drivers/clk/* changes can be merged from v4.18.
>
I have resent all of the clk patches (including all of the ones I listed as
dependencies in addition to the three remaining in this series) under the
cover "clk: davinci: outstanding fixes".
I also found that we need to add power-domains properties to the PWM nodes
in "ARM: dts: da850: Add clocks". I probably should just take your advice
and just globally added them even if they are not documented for some types
ofnodes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists