[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180525183538.GH14924@minitux>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 11:35:38 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: Use UFS_GDSC for UFS
On Fri 25 May 05:51 PDT 2018, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:01 AM, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > The UFS host controller occationally (20%) fails to enable
> > gcc_ufs_axi_clk because the UFS GDSC is not enabled. In most cases it's
> > enabled through the UFS phy driver, but to make sure it's enabled let's
> > enable it directly from the UFS host controller directly as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > index 380e14591686..03c7904bda14 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > @@ -674,6 +674,8 @@
> > vccq-max-microamp = <450000>;
> > vccq2-max-microamp = <450000>;
> >
> > + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_GDSC>;
> > +
>
> We shouldn't need power-domain with the phy. UFS_GDSC should
> be attached to the controller, as the phy is powered up only after
> the controller is power-up, and during collapse too, we turn off
> the phy first.
Afaict you're right, it should only be needed by the resources for the
HCD.
> Can you try testing keeping UFS_GDSC only with ufs controller and
> remove it from the ufs-phy node? We are doing same on the 4.14 release
> branch too for db820.
I test booted this 10 times, with 100% success :)
> I apologize to have missed this in your patch for ufs-related dt nodes.
> Can we please fix this now?
I'll send a v2, that moves the power-domain to the HCD, rather than just
adding it there too. Thanks for the quick review!
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists