[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180526144946.GF23390@flask>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 16:49:47 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] KVM: introduce kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask() API
2018-05-16 17:21+0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov:
> Hyper-V style PV TLB flush hypercalls inmplementation will use this API.
> To avoid memory allocation in CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK case add
> cpumask_var_t argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> -bool kvm_make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
> +bool kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req,
> + unsigned long *vcpu_bitmap, cpumask_var_t tmp)
> {
> int i, cpu, me;
> - cpumask_var_t cpus;
> - bool called;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> -
> - zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + bool called;
>
> me = get_cpu();
> +
Two optimizations come to mind: First is to use for_each_set_bit instead
of kvm_for_each_vcpu to improve the sparse case.
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + if (!test_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap))
And the second is to pass vcpu_bitmap = NULL instead of building the
bitmap with all VCPUs. Doesn't looks too good in the end, though:
#define kvm_for_each_vcpu_bitmap(idx, vcpup, kvm, bitmap, len) \
for (idx = (bitmap ? find_first_bit(bitmap, len) : 0); \
idx < len && (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \
bitmap ? find_next_bit(bitmap, len, idx + 1) : idx++)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists