linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 May 2018 19:42:43 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the arm tree

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 01:29:55PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes:

> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.

> Mark.  Did you get a bounce from this email?

> I saw this when perusing lkml but I did not receive a copy of this
> directly to myself.

Turns out xmission has decided to blacklist it, no idea why.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)