[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180527130901.GA18320@seema-Inspiron-15-3567>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 18:39:01 +0530
From: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
To: pablo@...filter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iptables-compat: homogenize error message
There is a difference between error messages in iptables and
iptables-compat:
#sudo iptables-compat -D INPUT 4
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
#sudo iptables -D INPUT 4
iptables: Index of deletion too big.
Now, will show same error message.
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
---
iptables/nft.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/iptables/nft.c b/iptables/nft.c
index e33d00f..40646f4 100644
--- a/iptables/nft.c
+++ b/iptables/nft.c
@@ -2603,7 +2603,7 @@ const char *nft_strerror(int err)
{ nft_rule_add, E2BIG, "Index of insertion too big" },
{ nft_rule_check, ENOENT, "Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?)" },
{ nft_rule_replace, ENOENT, "Index of replacement too big" },
- { nft_rule_delete_num, E2BIG, "Index of deletion too big" },
+ { nft_rule_delete_num, ENOENT, "Index of deletion too big" },
/* { TC_READ_COUNTER, E2BIG, "Index of counter too big" },
{ TC_ZERO_COUNTER, E2BIG, "Index of counter too big" }, */
{ nft_rule_add, ELOOP, "Loop found in table" },
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists