[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <152749140479.15132.14122696148962136409.stgit@devbox>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:10:04 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v4 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 kprobes code
Don't call the ->break_handler() from the s390 kprobes code,
because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c | 20 --------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
index 0967de19f53d..3e34018960b5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -332,26 +332,6 @@ static int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
enable_singlestep(kcb, regs, (unsigned long) p->ainsn.insn);
return 1;
- } else if (kprobe_running()) {
- p = __this_cpu_read(current_kprobe);
- if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
- /*
- * Continuation after the jprobe completed and
- * caused the jprobe_return trap. The jprobe
- * break_handler "returns" to the original
- * function that still has the kprobe breakpoint
- * installed. We continue with single stepping.
- */
- kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
- enable_singlestep(kcb, regs,
- (unsigned long) p->ainsn.insn);
- return 1;
- } /* else:
- * No kprobe at this address and the current kprobe
- * has no break handler (no jprobe!). The kernel just
- * exploded, let the standard trap handler pick up the
- * pieces.
- */
} /* else:
* No kprobe at this address and no active kprobe. The trap has
* not been caused by a kprobe breakpoint. The race of breakpoint
Powered by blists - more mailing lists