linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 133/496] arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180528100325.548181202@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 11:58:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
        Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 133/496] arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 9f416319f40cd857d2bb517630e5855a905ef3fb ]

do_task_stat() calls get_wchan(), which further does unwind_frame().
unwind_frame() restores frame->pc to original value in case function
graph tracer has modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook
a function return. However, if function graph tracer has hit a filtered
function, then we can't unwind it as ftrace_push_return_trace() has
biased the index(frame->graph) with a 'huge negative'
offset(-FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH).

Moreover, arm64 stack walker defines index(frame->graph) as unsigned
int, which can not compare a -ve number.

Similar problem we can have with calling of walk_stackframe() from
save_stack_trace_tsk() or dump_backtrace().

This patch fixes unwind_frame() to test the index for -ve value and
restore index accordingly before we can restore frame->pc.

Reproducer:

cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
echo schedule > set_graph_notrace
echo 1 > options/display-graph
echo wakeup > current_tracer
ps -ef | grep -i agent

Above commands result in:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff801bd3d1e000
pgd = ffff8003cbe97c00
[ffff801bd3d1e000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
[...]
CPU: 5 PID: 11696 Comm: ps Not tainted 4.11.0+ #33
[...]
task: ffff8003c21ba000 task.stack: ffff8003cc6c0000
PC is at unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
LR is at get_wchan+0xd4/0x134
pc : [<ffff00000808892c>] lr : [<ffff0000080860b8>] pstate: 60000145
sp : ffff8003cc6c3ab0
x29: ffff8003cc6c3ab0 x28: 0000000000000001
x27: 0000000000000026 x26: 0000000000000026
x25: 00000000000012d8 x24: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff8003c1c04000 x22: ffff000008c83000
x21: ffff8003c1c00000 x20: 000000000000000f
x19: ffff8003c1bc0000 x18: 0000fffffc593690
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001
x15: 0000b855670e2b60 x14: 0003e97f22cf1d0f
x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 00000000e8f4883e x10: 0000000154f47ec8
x9 : 0000000070f367c0 x8 : 0000000000000000
x7 : 00008003f7290000 x6 : 0000000000000018
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff8003c1c03cb0
x3 : ffff8003c1c03ca0 x2 : 00000017ffe80000
x1 : ffff8003cc6c3af8 x0 : ffff8003d3e9e000

Process ps (pid: 11696, stack limit = 0xffff8003cc6c0000)
Stack: (0xffff8003cc6c3ab0 to 0xffff8003cc6c4000)
[...]
[<ffff00000808892c>] unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180
[<ffff000008305008>] do_task_stat+0x864/0x870
[<ffff000008305c44>] proc_tgid_stat+0x3c/0x48
[<ffff0000082fde0c>] proc_single_show+0x5c/0xb8
[<ffff0000082b27e0>] seq_read+0x160/0x414
[<ffff000008289e6c>] __vfs_read+0x58/0x164
[<ffff00000828b164>] vfs_read+0x88/0x144
[<ffff00000828c2e8>] SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
[<ffff0000080834a0>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4

Fixes: 20380bb390a4 (arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer)
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
[catalin.marinas@....com: replace WARN_ON with WARN_ON_ONCE]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |    2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      |    5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c            |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct stackframe {
 	unsigned long fp;
 	unsigned long pc;
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-	unsigned int graph;
+	int graph;
 #endif
 };
 
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_str
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 	if (tsk->ret_stack &&
 			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->graph == -1))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (frame->graph < -1)
+			frame->graph += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH;
+
 		/*
 		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
 		 * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs
 	frame.fp = regs->regs[29];
 	frame.pc = regs->pc;
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-	frame.graph = -1; /* no task info */
+	frame.graph = current->curr_ret_stack;
 #endif
 	do {
 		int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame);