linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging:r8188eu: Use lib80211 to encrypt (WEP) tx frames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180528135351.5y66u4puldawfic5@mwanda>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 16:53:51 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Santha Meena Ramamoorthy <santhameena13@...il.com>,
        Janani Sankara Babu <jananis37@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:r8188eu: Use lib80211 to encrypt (WEP) tx frames

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:18:21AM +0300, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> Put data to skb, decrypt with lib80211_crypt_wep, and place back to tx buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> index bfe0b217e679..80d7569a3108 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -139,17 +139,11 @@ static __le32 getcrc32(u8 *buf, int len)
>  	Need to consider the fragment  situation
>  */
>  void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
> -{	/*  exclude ICV */
> -
> -	unsigned char	crc[4];
> -	struct arc4context	 mycontext;
> -
> +{
>  	int	curfragnum, length;
> -	u32	keylength;
>  
> -	u8	*pframe, *payload, *iv;    /* wepkey */
> -	u8	wepkey[16];
> -	u8   hw_hdr_offset = 0;
> +	u8 *pframe;
> +	u8 hw_hdr_offset = 0;
>  	struct	pkt_attrib	 *pattrib = &((struct xmit_frame *)pxmitframe)->attrib;
>  	struct	security_priv	*psecuritypriv = &padapter->securitypriv;
>  	struct	xmit_priv		*pxmitpriv = &padapter->xmitpriv;
> @@ -165,33 +159,53 @@ void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
>  
>  	/* start to encrypt each fragment */
>  	if ((pattrib->encrypt == _WEP40_) || (pattrib->encrypt == _WEP104_)) {
> -		keylength = psecuritypriv->dot11DefKeylen[psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex];
> +		const int keyindex = psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex;
> +		void *crypto_private;
> +		struct sk_buff *skb;
> +		struct lib80211_crypto_ops *crypto_ops = try_then_request_module(lib80211_get_crypto_ops("WEP"), "lib80211_crypt_wep");
> +
> +		if (!crypto_ops)
> +			goto exit;
> +
> +		crypto_private = crypto_ops->init(keyindex);
> +		if (!crypto_private)
> +			goto exit;
> +
> +		if (crypto_ops->set_key(psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[keyindex].skey,
> +					psecuritypriv->dot11DefKeylen[keyindex], NULL, crypto_private) < 0)
> +			goto exit;
>  
>  		for (curfragnum = 0; curfragnum < pattrib->nr_frags; curfragnum++) {
> -			iv = pframe+pattrib->hdrlen;
> -			memcpy(&wepkey[0], iv, 3);
> -			memcpy(&wepkey[3], &psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex].skey[0], keylength);
> -			payload = pframe+pattrib->iv_len+pattrib->hdrlen;
> +			if (curfragnum + 1 == pattrib->nr_frags)
> +				length = pattrib->last_txcmdsz;
> +			else
> +				length = pxmitpriv->frag_len;
> +			skb = dev_alloc_skb(length);
> +			if (!skb)
> +				goto exit;
>  
> -			if ((curfragnum+1) == pattrib->nr_frags) {	/* the last fragment */
> -				length = pattrib->last_txcmdsz-pattrib->hdrlen-pattrib->iv_len-pattrib->icv_len;
> +			skb_put_data(skb, pframe, length);
>  
> -				*((__le32 *)crc) = getcrc32(payload, length);
> +			memmove(skb->data + 4, skb->data, pattrib->hdrlen);
> +			skb_pull(skb, 4);
> +			skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4);
>  
> -				arcfour_init(&mycontext, wepkey, 3+keylength);
> -				arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
> -				arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload+length, crc, 4);
> -			} else {
> -				length = pxmitpriv->frag_len-pattrib->hdrlen-pattrib->iv_len-pattrib->icv_len;
> -				*((__le32 *)crc) = getcrc32(payload, length);
> -				arcfour_init(&mycontext, wepkey, 3+keylength);
> -				arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload, payload, length);
> -				arcfour_encrypt(&mycontext, payload+length, crc, 4);
> -
> -				pframe += pxmitpriv->frag_len;
> -				pframe = (u8 *)round_up((size_t)(pframe), 4);
> +			if (crypto_ops->encrypt_mpdu(skb, pattrib->hdrlen, crypto_private)) {
> +				kfree_skb(skb);
> +				goto exit;
>  			}
> +
> +			memcpy(pframe, skb->data, skb->len);
> +
> +			pframe += skb->len;
> +			pframe = (u8 *)round_up((size_t)(pframe), 4);
> +
> +			kfree_skb(skb);
>  		}
> +
> +exit:
> +		if (crypto_ops && crypto_private)
> +			crypto_ops->deinit(crypto_private);

One label style error handling is always bugggy.  I'm surprised GCC
doesn't catch that crypto_private can be uninitialized...

Flip the if ((pattrib->encrypt == _WEP40_) || (pattrib->encrypt == _WEP104_)) {
tests so it's:

	if (pattrib->encrypt != _WEP40_ && pattrib->encrypt != _WEP104_)
		return;

The use normal error handling style:

	kfree_skb(skb);
	return;

err_free_skb:
	kfree_skb(skb);
err_deinit:
	crypto_ops->deinit(crypto_private);
}

regards,
dan carpenter