[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180528100258.586488678@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:02:05 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 196/329] workqueue: use put_device() instead of kfree()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 537f4146c53c95aac977852b371bafb9c6755ee1 ]
Never directly free @dev after calling device_register(), even
if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the
reference initialized in this function instead.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5272,7 +5272,7 @@ int workqueue_sysfs_register(struct work
ret = device_register(&wq_dev->dev);
if (ret) {
- kfree(wq_dev);
+ put_device(&wq_dev->dev);
wq->wq_dev = NULL;
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists