[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb4A=oFh6iirtWLVqqf5F2JpZ3Q-Gc7i+tT9EP7Phb+Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 09:46:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Fix rework support for 1 interrupt per port
A GPIO
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Phil Edworthy
<phil.edworthy@...esas.com> wrote:
> Commit da069d5d2b814d9887989dcdb29fb0202eac8b38 ("gpio: dwapb: Rework
> support for 1 interrupt per port A GPIO"), was an incremental patch that
> was supposed to provide the delta between v5 and v6 patch set for
> adding support for 1 interupt per port A GPIO. v5 was applied, then some
> other feedback came afterwards.
>
> However, in my haste I managed to drop the changes made to dwapb_port_property
> struct. This patch includes those missing changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists