linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 065/329] ocfs2: return -EROFS to mount.ocfs2 if inode block is invalid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180528100248.223301411@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 11:59:54 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>,
        Alex Chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>,
        Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>,
        Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>, Gang He <ghe@...e.com>,
        Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 065/329] ocfs2: return -EROFS to mount.ocfs2 if inode block is invalid

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: piaojun <piaojun@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 025bcbde3634b2c9b316f227fed13ad6ad6817fb ]

If metadata is corrupted such as 'invalid inode block', we will get
failed by calling 'mount()' and then set filesystem readonly as below:

  ocfs2_mount
    ocfs2_initialize_super
      ocfs2_init_global_system_inodes
        ocfs2_iget
          ocfs2_read_locked_inode
            ocfs2_validate_inode_block
	      ocfs2_error
	        ocfs2_handle_error
	          ocfs2_set_ro_flag(osb, 0);  // set readonly

In this situation we need return -EROFS to 'mount.ocfs2', so that user
can fix it by fsck.  And then mount again.  In addition, 'mount.ocfs2'
should be updated correspondingly as it only return 1 for all errno.
And I will post a patch for 'mount.ocfs2' too.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5A4302FA.2010606@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>
Reviewed-by: Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/super.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
@@ -473,9 +473,8 @@ static int ocfs2_init_global_system_inod
 		new = ocfs2_get_system_file_inode(osb, i, osb->slot_num);
 		if (!new) {
 			ocfs2_release_system_inodes(osb);
-			status = -EINVAL;
+			status = ocfs2_is_soft_readonly(osb) ? -EROFS : -EINVAL;
 			mlog_errno(status);
-			/* FIXME: Should ERROR_RO_FS */
 			mlog(ML_ERROR, "Unable to load system inode %d, "
 			     "possibly corrupt fs?", i);
 			goto bail;
@@ -504,7 +503,7 @@ static int ocfs2_init_local_system_inode
 		new = ocfs2_get_system_file_inode(osb, i, osb->slot_num);
 		if (!new) {
 			ocfs2_release_system_inodes(osb);
-			status = -EINVAL;
+			status = ocfs2_is_soft_readonly(osb) ? -EROFS : -EINVAL;
 			mlog(ML_ERROR, "status=%d, sysfile=%d, slot=%d\n",
 			     status, i, osb->slot_num);
 			goto bail;