linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 173/268] sched/rt: Fix rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180528100221.993481294@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 12:02:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, dave@...olabs.net,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 173/268] sched/rt: Fix rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP warning

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>

[ Upstream commit d29a20645d5e929aa7e8616f28e5d8e1c49263ec ]

While running rt-tests' pi_stress program I got the following splat:

  rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
  WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:960 assert_clock_updated.isra.38.part.39+0x13/0x20

  [...]

  <IRQ>
  enqueue_top_rt_rq+0xf4/0x150
  ? cpufreq_dbs_governor_start+0x170/0x170
  sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x65/0x80
  sched_rt_period_timer+0x156/0x360
  ? sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x80/0x80
  __hrtimer_run_queues+0xfa/0x260
  hrtimer_interrupt+0xcb/0x220
  smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x62/0x120
  apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
  </IRQ>

  [...]

  do_idle+0x183/0x1e0
  cpu_startup_entry+0x5f/0x70
  start_secondary+0x192/0x1d0
  secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0

We can get rid of it be the "traditional" means of adding an
update_rq_clock() call after acquiring the rq->lock in
do_sched_rt_period_timer().

The case for the RT task throttling (which this workload also hits)
can be ignored in that the skip_update call is actually bogus and
quite the contrary (the request bits are removed/reverted).

By setting RQCF_UPDATED we really don't care if the skip is happening
or not and will therefore make the assert_clock_updated() check happy.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: dave@...olabs.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180402164954.16255-1-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/sched/rt.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -822,6 +822,8 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(stru
 		struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);

 		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		update_rq_clock(rq);
+
 		if (rt_rq->rt_time) {
 			u64 runtime;