| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1527495913.396.3.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:25:13 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Cawa Cheng <cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] drm/mediatek: move dpi private data to device
Hi, Bibby:
Some inline comment.
On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 15:52 +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> From: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@...iatek.com>
>
> move clock factor and edge enable setting to private data.
>
I think this modification is to separate different part of dpi driver
for different chip.
Describe more for this.
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> index e80a603e5fb0..993dc44368bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> @@ -71,11 +71,13 @@ struct mtk_dpi {
> struct clk *tvd_clk;
> int irq;
> struct drm_display_mode mode;
> + const struct mtk_dpi_conf *conf;
> enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format color_format;
> enum mtk_dpi_out_yc_map yc_map;
> enum mtk_dpi_out_bit_num bit_num;
> enum mtk_dpi_out_channel_swap channel_swap;
> bool power_sta;
> + int refcount;
> u8 power_ctl;
> };
>
> @@ -115,6 +117,12 @@ struct mtk_dpi_yc_limit {
> u16 c_bottom;
> };
>
> +struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> + unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> + const u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> + bool edge_sel_en;
> +};
> +
> static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> {
> u32 tmp = readl(dpi->regs + offset) & ~mask;
> @@ -340,7 +348,13 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_swap_input(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, bool enable)
>
> static void mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> {
> - mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_H_FRE_CON, H_FRE_2N, H_FRE_2N);
> + mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, H_FRE_2N, H_FRE_2N);
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> +{
> + if (dpi->conf->edge_sel_en)
> + mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
> }
>
> static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> @@ -368,6 +382,12 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>
> static void mtk_dpi_power_off(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, enum mtk_dpi_power_ctl pctl)
> {
> + if (WARN_ON(dpi->refcount == 0))
> + return;
> +
> + if (--dpi->refcount != 0)
> + return;
> +
I think 'refcount' should be moved to an independent patch.
> dpi->power_ctl &= ~pctl;
>
> if ((dpi->power_ctl & DPI_POWER_START) ||
> @@ -385,16 +405,19 @@ static void mtk_dpi_power_off(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, enum mtk_dpi_power_ctl pctl)
>
> static int mtk_dpi_power_on(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, enum mtk_dpi_power_ctl pctl)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (++dpi->refcount != 1)
> + return 0;
>
> dpi->power_ctl |= pctl;
>
> if (!(dpi->power_ctl & DPI_POWER_START) &&
> !(dpi->power_ctl & DPI_POWER_ENABLE))
> - return 0;
> + goto err_refcount;
>
> if (dpi->power_sta)
> - return 0;
> + goto err_refcount;
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(dpi->engine_clk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -416,6 +439,8 @@ static int mtk_dpi_power_on(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, enum mtk_dpi_power_ctl pctl)
> clk_disable_unprepare(dpi->engine_clk);
> err_eng:
> dpi->power_ctl &= ~pctl;
> +err_refcount:
> + dpi->refcount--;
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -433,16 +458,13 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> unsigned long pll_rate;
> unsigned int factor;
>
> + if (!dpi) {
> + dev_err(dpi->dev, "invalid argument\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> /* let pll_rate can fix the valid range of tvdpll (1G~2GHz) */
> pix_rate = 1000UL * mode->clock;
> - if (mode->clock <= 27000)
> - factor = 16 * 3;
> - else if (mode->clock <= 84000)
> - factor = 8 * 3;
> - else if (mode->clock <= 167000)
> - factor = 4 * 3;
> - else
> - factor = 2 * 3;
> + factor = dpi->conf->cal_factor(mode->clock);
> pll_rate = pix_rate * factor;
>
> dev_dbg(dpi->dev, "Want PLL %lu Hz, pixel clock %lu Hz\n",
> @@ -518,6 +540,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> mtk_dpi_config_yc_map(dpi, dpi->yc_map);
> mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> + mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
What does this do? Separate this to an independent patch and describe
what does this do.
> mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -656,6 +679,31 @@ static const struct component_ops mtk_dpi_component_ops = {
> .unbind = mtk_dpi_unbind,
> };
>
> +static unsigned int mt8173_calculate_factor(int clock)
> +{
> + if (clock <= 27000)
> + return 16 * 3;
> + else if (clock <= 74250)
Why do you change 84000 to 74250? If 74250 is correct for mt8173, use a
new patch for this bug fix.
Regards,
CK
> + return 8 * 3;
> + else if (clock <= 167000)
> + return 4 * 3;
> + else
> + return 2 * 3;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> + .cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> + .reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_dpi_of_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> + .data = &mt8173_conf,
> + },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_dpi_of_ids);
> +
> static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -663,13 +711,18 @@ static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *mem;
> struct device_node *bridge_node;
> int comp_id;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> int ret;
>
> + match = of_match_node(mtk_dpi_of_ids, dev->of_node);
> + if (!match)
> + return -ENODEV;
> dpi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dpi), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dpi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> dpi->dev = dev;
> + dpi->conf = (struct mtk_dpi_conf *)match->data;
>
> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> dpi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem);
> @@ -748,11 +801,6 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id mtk_dpi_of_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi", },
> - {}
> -};
> -
> struct platform_driver mtk_dpi_driver = {
> .probe = mtk_dpi_probe,
> .remove = mtk_dpi_remove,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h
> index 4b6ad4751a31..d9db8c4cacd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,6 @@
> #define ESAV_CODE2 (0xFFF << 0)
> #define ESAV_CODE3_MSB BIT(16)
>
> -#define DPI_H_FRE_CON 0xE0
> +#define EDGE_SEL_EN BIT(5)
> #define H_FRE_2N BIT(25)
> #endif /* __MTK_DPI_REGS_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists